1. "State" in the prevention and eradication are the following directions:

1.1. parties and associations of funding control, preventing and fighting against private persons or groups in a separate economic impact on the national and local policy;

1.2. parties and voters' association of the financial activities of the control mechanisms;

1.3. establishment of a system in which private parties, State or local government decision-making process is based on equality, openness and transparency principles (lobbying legalization).

2. Inefficient, ineffective and illegal state and municipal property usage to prevent and combat are the following directions:

2.1. rectification of the legal framework concerning the issue of national and local financial resources and property in waste prevention;

2.2. State and local property control spending;

2.3. State and local government procurement, improving control and offender accountability;

2.4. sufficient quantity to provide state and local auditing of the use of funds;

2.5. State and municipal budgets for the provision of openness.

3. Means of control development are the following directions:

3.1. law enforcement of tax administration, focusing on population, including - government officials, revenue control system, as well as adequate punishment system;

3.2. population control property development;

3.3. AML alleviation.

4. Anti-corruption capacity-building, providing a quick and quality of criminal investigations, are the following directions:

4.1. Corruption Prevention and Combating Bureau and its institutions for the development;

4.2. fighting corruption law enforcement agencies involved in the social security institutions and the improvement of the technical support improvement;

4.3. witnesses and notifying defense;

4.4. improving the business environment and legal responsibility for corrupting public service activities in the field of development;

4.5. enhance international cooperation.

5. The European Union and other international institutions and organizations in the funding of legitimate and appropriate allocation of the following courses of action are:

5.1. The European Union and other international institutions involved in the financing of institutions and officials of funding for control and monitoring mechanisms;

5.2. Latvia's cooperation with the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF), the provision and improvement.

6. The internal anti-corruption system and the improvement of national and local government institutions have the following directions:

6.1. public officials' interests in conflict prevention in the national and local institutions;

6.2. The introduction of stricter criteria for recruitment at the national and local government institutions to reduce the risk of corruption;

6.3. effective internal control mechanisms of the state and municipal institutions, with special emphasis on the judicial, prosecutorial and police activities;

6.4. ētiskuma strengthening of national and local institutions.

7. The awareness-raising of public officials and other members of the public on issues related to corruption are the following directions:

7.1. State officials, as well as private sector representatives of anti-corruption education and the eradication area;

7.2. Public involvement in policy making and fair decision-making process;

7.3. Informing the public about the problems of corruption, citizens' rights and responsibilities, to prevent conflict of interest requirements, ethics standards bodies;

7.4. Studies and surveys carried out on the prevalence and manifestations of corruption.